<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1232 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788477</link>
    <description>In reassessment, an addition was quashed because the Assessing Officer did not furnish statements and documents obtained from the Investigation Wing despite a specific Tribunal remand direction. The failure to supply the relied-upon material and to give the assessee an effective opportunity to rebut it was held to violate natural justice and procedural fairness. The record showed no compliance with the remand mandate, and the assessment was therefore vitiated. The challenge regarding the scope of remand was noted, but the decisive defect remained non-production of the investigative material and denial of hearing. The appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 08:49:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1232 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788477</link>
      <description>In reassessment, an addition was quashed because the Assessing Officer did not furnish statements and documents obtained from the Investigation Wing despite a specific Tribunal remand direction. The failure to supply the relied-upon material and to give the assessee an effective opportunity to rebut it was held to violate natural justice and procedural fairness. The record showed no compliance with the remand mandate, and the assessment was therefore vitiated. The challenge regarding the scope of remand was noted, but the decisive defect remained non-production of the investigative material and denial of hearing. The appeal was allowed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788477</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>