https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50743 The Tribunal accepted the preliminary objection on lack of jurisdiction raised by the applicants' counsel. The appeals were allowed, and the case was remitted back to the Commissioner with the correct jurisdiction for re-adjudication. The appellants were directed to cooperate, and the stay applications were disposed of. The judgment emphasized the significance of adhering to designated jurisdictions specified in show cause notices and the legal consequences of jurisdictional errors in adjudication processes. en-us Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:52:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50743 The Tribunal accepted the preliminary objection on lack of jurisdiction raised by the applicants' counsel. The appeals were allowed, and the case was remitted back to the Commissioner with the correct jurisdiction for re-adjudication. The appellants were directed to cooperate, and the stay applications were disposed of. The judgment emphasized the significance of adhering to designated jurisdictions specified in show cause notices and the legal consequences of jurisdictional errors in adjudication processes. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 13 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50743