https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788483 Interim protection was granted against coercive recovery while the petitioner pursued the statutory appellate remedy under the U.P. GST Act. The Court noted the dispute over assessment orders, the petitioner's complaint that an effective reply could not be filed because relevant documents were uploaded on a different portal, and the earlier failed attempt before the appellate authority. Taking account of the disputed demand and asserted financial difficulty, the Court permitted continuation on compliance with a reduced deposit of Rs. 3.50 crore within two weeks and required filing of the receipt before the Registry, with coercive steps stayed upon compliance. en-us Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 23 Mar 2026 08:49:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788483 Interim protection was granted against coercive recovery while the petitioner pursued the statutory appellate remedy under the U.P. GST Act. The Court noted the dispute over assessment orders, the petitioner's complaint that an effective reply could not be filed because relevant documents were uploaded on a different portal, and the earlier failed attempt before the appellate authority. Taking account of the disputed demand and asserted financial difficulty, the Court permitted continuation on compliance with a reduced deposit of Rs. 3.50 crore within two weeks and required filing of the receipt before the Registry, with coercive steps stayed upon compliance. Case-Laws GST Fri, 20 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788483