<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Characterisation of software expenditure as recurring maintenance costs; treated as revenue expenditure and allowed as deductible.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97965</link>
    <description>Characterisation of software expenditure focused on whether payments were capital or revenue; the payments were held to be recurring annual maintenance, database support and licence renewal costs conferring only annual benefits, with no transfer of ownership, no creation of a software asset or enduring benefit to the assessee&#039;s asset base. The assessing officer failed to produce cogent material showing a capital asset arose. Operative effect: the payments were treated as revenue expenditure and allowable under income-tax deductibility principles, leading to deletion of the addition and dismissal of the revenue appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 08:49:39 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 08:49:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892199" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Characterisation of software expenditure as recurring maintenance costs; treated as revenue expenditure and allowed as deductible.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97965</link>
      <description>Characterisation of software expenditure focused on whether payments were capital or revenue; the payments were held to be recurring annual maintenance, database support and licence renewal costs conferring only annual benefits, with no transfer of ownership, no creation of a software asset or enduring benefit to the assessee&#039;s asset base. The assessing officer failed to produce cogent material showing a capital asset arose. Operative effect: the payments were treated as revenue expenditure and allowable under income-tax deductibility principles, leading to deletion of the addition and dismissal of the revenue appeal.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 08:49:39 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>