<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1896 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467509</link>
    <description>Issue concerns whether a Section 9 insolvency petition filed on 29.03.2019 is time-barred where debt fell due on 22.11.2012 and an alleged written acknowledgment dated 31.03.2016 exists. The legal principle applied is that a debtor&#039;s written acknowledgment must be signed and supported by admissible evidence before the expiry of the limitation period to create a fresh limitation period under the Limitation Act; unverified books of account or unsubstantiated balance confirmations do not qualify as such acknowledgment. Outcome: the alleged acknowledgment was not established by credible admissible documentary evidence and the Section 9 application is barred by limitation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 22:41:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1896 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467509</link>
      <description>Issue concerns whether a Section 9 insolvency petition filed on 29.03.2019 is time-barred where debt fell due on 22.11.2012 and an alleged written acknowledgment dated 31.03.2016 exists. The legal principle applied is that a debtor&#039;s written acknowledgment must be signed and supported by admissible evidence before the expiry of the limitation period to create a fresh limitation period under the Limitation Act; unverified books of account or unsubstantiated balance confirmations do not qualify as such acknowledgment. Outcome: the alleged acknowledgment was not established by credible admissible documentary evidence and the Section 9 application is barred by limitation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467509</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>