<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (3) TMI 193 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50734</link>
    <description>Modvat credit was held admissible on inputs used in trial production because the inputs were employed in or in relation to manufacture, and the trial run formed an essential part of that process. Credit could not be denied merely because the trial stage yielded waste, scrap, or no marketable final product. Rule 57D also protected credit where part of the inputs became waste or refuse during manufacture. On that basis, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:16:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (3) TMI 193 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50734</link>
      <description>Modvat credit was held admissible on inputs used in trial production because the inputs were employed in or in relation to manufacture, and the trial run formed an essential part of that process. Credit could not be denied merely because the trial stage yielded waste, scrap, or no marketable final product. Rule 57D also protected credit where part of the inputs became waste or refuse during manufacture. On that basis, the Revenue&#039;s appeal was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Mar 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50734</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>