https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50731 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order confiscating gold and imposing a penalty, remanding the matter for reconsideration. The Tribunal found the Commissioner failed to address the appellant's intent to declare the gold and the option of redemption fine adequately. The case was referred back to the Commissioner of Customs, Chennai, for a fresh decision within five months, considering the appellant's arguments and relevant legal principles. en-us Mon, 16 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Sep 2010 10:09:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50731 The Tribunal set aside the Commissioner's order confiscating gold and imposing a penalty, remanding the matter for reconsideration. The Tribunal found the Commissioner failed to address the appellant's intent to declare the gold and the option of redemption fine adequately. The case was referred back to the Commissioner of Customs, Chennai, for a fresh decision within five months, considering the appellant's arguments and relevant legal principles. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 16 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50731