<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1148 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788393</link>
    <description>Classification of Rishisol S-1, S-2, S-3 and B-1 under CTH 2710.13 as motor spirit turned on cumulative satisfaction of the tariff conditions, including hydrocarbon oil status, a flash point below 25 C, and suitability for use as fuel in spark ignition engines. Although the products met the flash point requirement, the record, including the technical material relied on by both sides, did not establish actual suitability for use as fuel in spark ignition engines. Because the department failed to discharge the burden on that essential condition, reclassification under CTH 2710.13 was rejected and the assessee&#039;s classification was sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:29:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892069" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1148 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788393</link>
      <description>Classification of Rishisol S-1, S-2, S-3 and B-1 under CTH 2710.13 as motor spirit turned on cumulative satisfaction of the tariff conditions, including hydrocarbon oil status, a flash point below 25 C, and suitability for use as fuel in spark ignition engines. Although the products met the flash point requirement, the record, including the technical material relied on by both sides, did not establish actual suitability for use as fuel in spark ignition engines. Because the department failed to discharge the burden on that essential condition, reclassification under CTH 2710.13 was rejected and the assessee&#039;s classification was sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>