https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788401 Dispute concerns restoration of directors, appointment of an Administrator, and admissibility of forensic examination of disputed payment receipts. The tribunal affirmed administrative intervention where facts showed incomplete compliance with an alleged oral family settlement, unresolved cash-payment and forgery allegations, and non-production of key documents; it therefore declined to displace the NCLT's core directions restoring directors and appointing an Administrator. The order was modified to permit the Administrator, if presented with disputed receipts during administration or a buyout process, to apply to the NCLT for limited forensic examination of those receipts. en-us Thu, 19 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:29:03 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788401 Dispute concerns restoration of directors, appointment of an Administrator, and admissibility of forensic examination of disputed payment receipts. The tribunal affirmed administrative intervention where facts showed incomplete compliance with an alleged oral family settlement, unresolved cash-payment and forgery allegations, and non-production of key documents; it therefore declined to displace the NCLT's core directions restoring directors and appointing an Administrator. The order was modified to permit the Administrator, if presented with disputed receipts during administration or a buyout process, to apply to the NCLT for limited forensic examination of those receipts. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 19 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788401