https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50724 A rectification application based on alleged mistakes apparent from the record failed because none of the three grounds disclosed any recordable error. The plea that accounts could not be maintained during a period of tension was unsupported by evidence showing disruption of normal life, so no omission was established. The objection regarding entry of rubber stoppers in RG 1 before pharmacopoeial testing had already been considered and rejected for lack of proof of any accepted practice. The challenge to the duty demand on inputs in RG 23A did not undermine the recorded basis that credit-taken inputs were removed without proper accounting. The application was rejected in full. en-us Sat, 11 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:03:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50724 A rectification application based on alleged mistakes apparent from the record failed because none of the three grounds disclosed any recordable error. The plea that accounts could not be maintained during a period of tension was unsupported by evidence showing disruption of normal life, so no omission was established. The objection regarding entry of rubber stoppers in RG 1 before pharmacopoeial testing had already been considered and rejected for lack of proof of any accepted practice. The challenge to the duty demand on inputs in RG 23A did not undermine the recorded basis that credit-taken inputs were removed without proper accounting. The application was rejected in full. Case-Laws Central Excise Sat, 11 Aug 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50724