<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Natural justice breach: denial of cross-examination on third-party seized material led to deletion of additions under s.69B.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97941</link>
    <description>Denial of opportunity to test third-party evidence by cross-examination breaches natural justice and, where additions rest solely on uncorroborated seized material and a general statement not specifically identifying the taxpayer, such material cannot discharge the Revenue&#039;s onus to prove undisclosed consideration; accordingly the addition was unsustainable and deleted. The analysis emphasises that reliance on third-party search material requires both specific linkage to the taxpayer and procedural fairness through disclosure and the right to confront the witness; absent corroboration, the material only raises suspicion and does not justify tax additions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:29:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=892001" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Natural justice breach: denial of cross-examination on third-party seized material led to deletion of additions under s.69B.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97941</link>
      <description>Denial of opportunity to test third-party evidence by cross-examination breaches natural justice and, where additions rest solely on uncorroborated seized material and a general statement not specifically identifying the taxpayer, such material cannot discharge the Revenue&#039;s onus to prove undisclosed consideration; accordingly the addition was unsustainable and deleted. The analysis emphasises that reliance on third-party search material requires both specific linkage to the taxpayer and procedural fairness through disclosure and the right to confront the witness; absent corroboration, the material only raises suspicion and does not justify tax additions.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:29:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97941</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>