<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Due Diligence: Broker KYC met regulatory standard, revocation set aside and licence restored after hearsay and covert survey evidence rejected.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97933</link>
    <description>Revocation of a customs broker licence was set aside because findings rested on assumptions, covert market surveys and hearsay rather than admissible proof; the broker&#039;s KYC and documentary checks satisfied the due diligence standard under Regulation 10(n) and did not require physical inspection; procedural defects including failure to consider replies and delayed inquiry vitiated disciplinary action; consequential forfeiture and penalty were quashed and the licence restored with directions to return security and penalty, the Tribunal concluding evidence was insufficient and the inquiry procedurally flawed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:29:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891993" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Due Diligence: Broker KYC met regulatory standard, revocation set aside and licence restored after hearsay and covert survey evidence rejected.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97933</link>
      <description>Revocation of a customs broker licence was set aside because findings rested on assumptions, covert market surveys and hearsay rather than admissible proof; the broker&#039;s KYC and documentary checks satisfied the due diligence standard under Regulation 10(n) and did not require physical inspection; procedural defects including failure to consider replies and delayed inquiry vitiated disciplinary action; consequential forfeiture and penalty were quashed and the licence restored with directions to return security and penalty, the Tribunal concluding evidence was insufficient and the inquiry procedurally flawed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:29:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97933</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>