<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Prima facie arbitration agreement confirmed; impleadment of non signatory allowed on prima facie basis, joinder left to tribunal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97923</link>
    <description>Prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement in the amended partnership deed was found, and the court authorised appointment of the petitioner&#039;s nominee as arbitrator subject to the arbitrator&#039;s compliance with applicable independence and disclosure obligations. On impleadment, the court conducted only a prima facie inquiry and accepted pleaded allegations of commonality of subject matter and alter ego conduct by a non signatory, while leaving substantive questions of joinder, misjoinder and piercing the corporate veil to the arbitral tribunal under the kompetenz kompetenz principle; objections to joinder were retained for the tribunal to decide.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:29:07 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:29:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891983" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Prima facie arbitration agreement confirmed; impleadment of non signatory allowed on prima facie basis, joinder left to tribunal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97923</link>
      <description>Prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement in the amended partnership deed was found, and the court authorised appointment of the petitioner&#039;s nominee as arbitrator subject to the arbitrator&#039;s compliance with applicable independence and disclosure obligations. On impleadment, the court conducted only a prima facie inquiry and accepted pleaded allegations of commonality of subject matter and alter ego conduct by a non signatory, while leaving substantive questions of joinder, misjoinder and piercing the corporate veil to the arbitral tribunal under the kompetenz kompetenz principle; objections to joinder were retained for the tribunal to decide.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 08:29:07 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97923</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>