https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467483 In a complaint under Sections 138, 141 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, non-impleadment of the company was treated as a curable defect where the complaint alleged that cheques were issued in the course of the company's business and the named applicants were connected with the transaction. The trial court was found to have proceeded on an incorrect analogy from other criminal proceedings and to have overlooked the special nature of NI Act complaints, while the revisional order left the impleadment request open for decision according to law. The summoning orders were set aside and the matter remitted for consideration of the impleadment applications; the applicants were not entitled to be heard at that stage. en-us Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Mar 2026 18:58:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467483 In a complaint under Sections 138, 141 and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, non-impleadment of the company was treated as a curable defect where the complaint alleged that cheques were issued in the course of the company's business and the named applicants were connected with the transaction. The trial court was found to have proceeded on an incorrect analogy from other criminal proceedings and to have overlooked the special nature of NI Act complaints, while the revisional order left the impleadment request open for decision according to law. The summoning orders were set aside and the matter remitted for consideration of the impleadment applications; the applicants were not entitled to be heard at that stage. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 24 Jul 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467483