<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1895 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467490</link>
    <description>Failure to file required foreign investment intimations and FC-GPR forms, and failure to refund inward remittances within the prescribed period, constituted contraventions of FEMA and the applicable foreign-security regulations. These compliance obligations attract civil monetary liability irrespective of criminal mens rea. Liability for the contraventions was affirmed because the receipt of remittances and the non-compliance were admitted. Penalty quantum was nevertheless reduced, as the appellate authority could consider mitigating material, the statutory penalty framework, prior compounding efforts and proportionality. The adjudication order consequently stood modified only to the extent of the reduced penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 18:58:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1895 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467490</link>
      <description>Failure to file required foreign investment intimations and FC-GPR forms, and failure to refund inward remittances within the prescribed period, constituted contraventions of FEMA and the applicable foreign-security regulations. These compliance obligations attract civil monetary liability irrespective of criminal mens rea. Liability for the contraventions was affirmed because the receipt of remittances and the non-compliance were admitted. Penalty quantum was nevertheless reduced, as the appellate authority could consider mitigating material, the statutory penalty framework, prior compounding efforts and proportionality. The adjudication order consequently stood modified only to the extent of the reduced penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467490</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>