https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467491 The dispute concerned production of criminal complaints, FIRs and judicial decisions as additional documents under Rules 11, 13, 32 and 40 of the NCLT Rules, 2016; the tribunal appropriately exercised discretion by excluding criminal process documents from civil evidentiary record on admissibility and relevance grounds and by holding that court judgments may be relied on during submissions without formal admission as additional evidence. The appellate review found no procedural error or illegality in that exercise of discretion and upheld the refusal to place the impugned documents on record. en-us Fri, 14 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Mar 2026 18:58:41 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467491 The dispute concerned production of criminal complaints, FIRs and judicial decisions as additional documents under Rules 11, 13, 32 and 40 of the NCLT Rules, 2016; the tribunal appropriately exercised discretion by excluding criminal process documents from civil evidentiary record on admissibility and relevance grounds and by holding that court judgments may be relied on during submissions without formal admission as additional evidence. The appellate review found no procedural error or illegality in that exercise of discretion and upheld the refusal to place the impugned documents on record. Case-Laws Companies Law Fri, 14 Jun 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467491