<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (6) TMI 125 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50715</link>
    <description>The Tribunal concluded that there was insufficient evidence to prove the seized silver bars were of foreign origin or that the appellants were involved in smuggling. The burden of proof was not met by the department, and the acquittal by the Economic Offence Court was considered relevant. As a result, penalties imposed on the appellants were overturned, and their appeals were granted with appropriate relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:32:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89194" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (6) TMI 125 - CEGAT, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50715</link>
      <description>The Tribunal concluded that there was insufficient evidence to prove the seized silver bars were of foreign origin or that the appellants were involved in smuggling. The burden of proof was not met by the department, and the acquittal by the Economic Offence Court was considered relevant. As a result, penalties imposed on the appellants were overturned, and their appeals were granted with appropriate relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jun 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50715</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>