<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (7) TMI 185 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50698</link>
    <description>Dipped and rubberised nylon tyre cord fabric was held classifiable under Heading 59.06 of the Central Excise Tariff, following prior Tribunal rulings on identical processed tyre cord fabric. The Tribunal found no valid basis to distinguish the earlier coordinate bench decisions and noted that departmental authorities were bound to follow the settled classification. As both sides accepted that no additional excise duty would arise if the goods fell under Heading 59.06, the duty demand could not survive and was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 14:01:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89177" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (7) TMI 185 - CEGAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50698</link>
      <description>Dipped and rubberised nylon tyre cord fabric was held classifiable under Heading 59.06 of the Central Excise Tariff, following prior Tribunal rulings on identical processed tyre cord fabric. The Tribunal found no valid basis to distinguish the earlier coordinate bench decisions and noted that departmental authorities were bound to follow the settled classification. As both sides accepted that no additional excise duty would arise if the goods fell under Heading 59.06, the duty demand could not survive and was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50698</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>