<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (2) TMI 235 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50690</link>
    <description>Molasses stock discrepancies determined only by volumetric tank measurement were held unreliable because volume varies with temperature, foam and decomposition, making actual weighment the more dependable method. The Tribunal also relied on departmental guidance permitting condonation of storage loss up to 2% of molasses. On that basis, the alleged excess and shortage were not established with sufficient certainty, and confiscation, duty demand and penalty could not be sustained. The lower order was therefore vacated and no liability survived on the disputed stock discrepancy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 13:45:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89169" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (2) TMI 235 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50690</link>
      <description>Molasses stock discrepancies determined only by volumetric tank measurement were held unreliable because volume varies with temperature, foam and decomposition, making actual weighment the more dependable method. The Tribunal also relied on departmental guidance permitting condonation of storage loss up to 2% of molasses. On that basis, the alleged excess and shortage were not established with sufficient certainty, and confiscation, duty demand and penalty could not be sustained. The lower order was therefore vacated and no liability survived on the disputed stock discrepancy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50690</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>