<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (3) TMI 1619 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467478</link>
    <description>Secondment or deputation of trained personnel may fall within manpower recruitment or supply agency service where one entity provides personnel to another, even if the recipient reimburses salary without a separate markup. The absence of a contractual obligation to supply personnel does not by itself prevent taxability. Extended limitation under the Finance Act, 1994 requires proof of suppression with intent to evade tax or other clear statutory grounds; prior disclosures, available records and genuine interpretative uncertainty may defeat its invocation. Taxability may therefore apply for the normal period, subject to verification of receipts, while penalties need not be imposed for the remanded period.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 11:49:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891647" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (3) TMI 1619 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467478</link>
      <description>Secondment or deputation of trained personnel may fall within manpower recruitment or supply agency service where one entity provides personnel to another, even if the recipient reimburses salary without a separate markup. The absence of a contractual obligation to supply personnel does not by itself prevent taxability. Extended limitation under the Finance Act, 1994 requires proof of suppression with intent to evade tax or other clear statutory grounds; prior disclosures, available records and genuine interpretative uncertainty may defeat its invocation. Taxability may therefore apply for the normal period, subject to verification of receipts, while penalties need not be imposed for the remanded period.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467478</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>