https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788304 Revisional orders under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act could not be sustained where the contract work was executed entirely on a back-to-back subcontract basis and the subcontractors had already declared the relevant turnover and discharged the tax liability. In that situation, further examination of the remaining merits became academic because the turnover in question had already suffered tax. The revisional orders were therefore unsustainable, and the appeals succeeded with the impugned orders set aside. en-us Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:35:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788304 Revisional orders under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act could not be sustained where the contract work was executed entirely on a back-to-back subcontract basis and the subcontractors had already declared the relevant turnover and discharged the tax liability. In that situation, further examination of the remaining merits became academic because the turnover in question had already suffered tax. The revisional orders were therefore unsustainable, and the appeals succeeded with the impugned orders set aside. Case-Laws VAT / Sales Tax Thu, 12 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788304