<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1066 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788311</link>
    <description>Construction-related services under the category of works contract service were treated as not taxable for the period from 01.04.2009 to 30.06.2010. The Tribunal view and CBEC circulars were followed on the basis that such construction activity was not liable to service tax before 01.07.2010, and the issue was considered no longer res integra. The operative effect was that no service tax could be levied for the impugned period, so the demand could not be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:35:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891621" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1066 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788311</link>
      <description>Construction-related services under the category of works contract service were treated as not taxable for the period from 01.04.2009 to 30.06.2010. The Tribunal view and CBEC circulars were followed on the basis that such construction activity was not liable to service tax before 01.07.2010, and the issue was considered no longer res integra. The operative effect was that no service tax could be levied for the impugned period, so the demand could not be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788311</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>