<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1073 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788318</link>
    <description>The note addresses provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, focusing on (i) corporate links and unexplained director/share transfers as indicia of shielding proceeds, (ii) attachment of property acquired prior to the offence as &#039;equivalent value&#039; where proceeds cannot be traced, and (iii) satisfaction of Section 5(1) conditions-a recorded reason to believe and risk of concealment/alienation-based on FIRs, charge sheets and transfer patterns. The operative proposition is that where proceeds have been siphoned or layered and cannot be traced, equivalent-value properties may be provisionally attached subject to statutory safeguards and recorded reasons. The attachments were upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:35:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891614" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1073 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788318</link>
      <description>The note addresses provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, focusing on (i) corporate links and unexplained director/share transfers as indicia of shielding proceeds, (ii) attachment of property acquired prior to the offence as &#039;equivalent value&#039; where proceeds cannot be traced, and (iii) satisfaction of Section 5(1) conditions-a recorded reason to believe and risk of concealment/alienation-based on FIRs, charge sheets and transfer patterns. The operative proposition is that where proceeds have been siphoned or layered and cannot be traced, equivalent-value properties may be provisionally attached subject to statutory safeguards and recorded reasons. The attachments were upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788318</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>