<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1075 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788320</link>
    <description>Confirmation of a provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was sustained where transaction records, bank transfers, lack of credible source of funds, absence of genuine revenue or corroborative buyer-seller documentation, inconsistent share certificates and links between the company and the prohibited organisation together supported treatment of impugned transfers as proceeds of crime; documentary discrepancies failed to rebut the attachment. Operative effect: the confirmation of attachment is held sustainable under the Act, with the appeals dismissed and the attachment order maintained under the statutory definitions and Section 26 enforcement framework.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:35:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891612" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1075 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788320</link>
      <description>Confirmation of a provisional attachment under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was sustained where transaction records, bank transfers, lack of credible source of funds, absence of genuine revenue or corroborative buyer-seller documentation, inconsistent share certificates and links between the company and the prohibited organisation together supported treatment of impugned transfers as proceeds of crime; documentary discrepancies failed to rebut the attachment. Operative effect: the confirmation of attachment is held sustainable under the Act, with the appeals dismissed and the attachment order maintained under the statutory definitions and Section 26 enforcement framework.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788320</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>