<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1083 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788328</link>
    <description>Once the corporate debtor was sold as a going concern and the liquidation proceedings were subsequently closed, the earlier order directing commencement of liquidation lost practical effect. The appellate challenge could not be examined on merits because the relief sought had become academic. The appeals were therefore treated as infructuous and dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:35:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1083 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788328</link>
      <description>Once the corporate debtor was sold as a going concern and the liquidation proceedings were subsequently closed, the earlier order directing commencement of liquidation lost practical effect. The appellate challenge could not be examined on merits because the relief sought had become academic. The appeals were therefore treated as infructuous and dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788328</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>