<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1097 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788342</link>
    <description>Whether deposits of demonetised banknotes can be treated as unexplained cash credits under section 68 was addressed by examining whether the assessee furnished identification of creditors, books of account, bank entries, purchase invoices, stock records and comparative sales data; where statutory identification and source explanations were met, purchases were through banking channels, stock availability supported sales and profit on sales was offered to tax, regulatory contravention alone did not convert recorded sales into unexplained income; consequence: the addition under section 68 was held unsustainable and deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:35:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891590" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1097 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788342</link>
      <description>Whether deposits of demonetised banknotes can be treated as unexplained cash credits under section 68 was addressed by examining whether the assessee furnished identification of creditors, books of account, bank entries, purchase invoices, stock records and comparative sales data; where statutory identification and source explanations were met, purchases were through banking channels, stock availability supported sales and profit on sales was offered to tax, regulatory contravention alone did not convert recorded sales into unexplained income; consequence: the addition under section 68 was held unsustainable and deleted in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>