<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1135 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788380</link>
    <description>Absolute assignment of leasehold rights in GIDC land was treated as a transfer of the leasehold interest itself, not a mere service of use or enjoyment. Applying the GST scheme on scope of supply, the Court held that such a transfer of benefits arising from immovable property falls outside the taxable supply of services and is not exigible to GST under the State GST law. On that basis, the show-cause proceedings and demand based on the assignment transaction could not stand, and the impugned demand order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:35:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891552" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1135 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788380</link>
      <description>Absolute assignment of leasehold rights in GIDC land was treated as a transfer of the leasehold interest itself, not a mere service of use or enjoyment. Applying the GST scheme on scope of supply, the Court held that such a transfer of benefits arising from immovable property falls outside the taxable supply of services and is not exigible to GST under the State GST law. On that basis, the show-cause proceedings and demand based on the assignment transaction could not stand, and the impugned demand order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788380</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>