<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Service by Email: recorded email addresses validate notices but pandemic excuse may condone appeal delay, subject to deposit.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97907</link>
    <description>Notices issued to the email address recorded in the tax database were held valid in law; non-service cannot be attributed to the Assessing Officer where the assessee provided or allowed an inaccessible email ID, and the assessee bears the duty to furnish and monitor a valid communication address, but must still be afforded an opportunity to be heard. Where pandemic-related non-communication plausibly explains delayed compliance, delay in filing appeals to the CIT(A) was condoned and the appeals were restored for adjudication on merits, subject to a protective condition that the assessee deposit twenty percent of the demand; no fresh assessment or remand to the Assessing Officer was ordered.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:35:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:35:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Service by Email: recorded email addresses validate notices but pandemic excuse may condone appeal delay, subject to deposit.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97907</link>
      <description>Notices issued to the email address recorded in the tax database were held valid in law; non-service cannot be attributed to the Assessing Officer where the assessee provided or allowed an inaccessible email ID, and the assessee bears the duty to furnish and monitor a valid communication address, but must still be afforded an opportunity to be heard. Where pandemic-related non-communication plausibly explains delayed compliance, delay in filing appeals to the CIT(A) was condoned and the appeals were restored for adjudication on merits, subject to a protective condition that the assessee deposit twenty percent of the demand; no fresh assessment or remand to the Assessing Officer was ordered.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:35:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>