<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Predicate offence for money laundering justified continuation of proceedings and upheld seizure due to admissions and ledger evidence.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97881</link>
    <description>Challenge to seizure and retention of cash during search was considered on three dominant issues: whether a predicate offence for money laundering existed, whether reasons to believe and relied documents were furnished, and whether recorded admissions and bank/cash ledgers substantiated source of funds. The Tribunal concluded that the FIRs and investigations disclosed offences underpinning a predicate offence, that the reasons to believe and relied documents were served to the appellants, and that the appellants&#039; explanations failed in view of withdrawal patterns, ledger entries, bank records described as licence receipts and recorded admissions; accordingly seizure and retention were upheld pending trial.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:35:17 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:35:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Predicate offence for money laundering justified continuation of proceedings and upheld seizure due to admissions and ledger evidence.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97881</link>
      <description>Challenge to seizure and retention of cash during search was considered on three dominant issues: whether a predicate offence for money laundering existed, whether reasons to believe and relied documents were furnished, and whether recorded admissions and bank/cash ledgers substantiated source of funds. The Tribunal concluded that the FIRs and investigations disclosed offences underpinning a predicate offence, that the reasons to believe and relied documents were served to the appellants, and that the appellants&#039; explanations failed in view of withdrawal patterns, ledger entries, bank records described as licence receipts and recorded admissions; accordingly seizure and retention were upheld pending trial.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2026 08:35:17 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>