<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 977 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788222</link>
    <description>Contractual designation and conduct establishing custody of goods, sale at company prescribed prices, banking of proceeds and turnover based commission confirm the appellant&#039;s status as a consignment agent, which falls within clearing and forwarding agent services under Section 65(25) and Section 65(105)(j) of the Finance Act, 1994; accordingly service tax demand is sustained. The appellant&#039;s filing of &#039;Nil&#039; returns and non disclosure of commission receipts justify invocation of the extended period of limitation. Payment of service tax with interest before issuance of the show cause notice and partial payment of penalty warrant mitigation: no further Section 78 recovery beyond the amount paid and Section 77 penalty reduced.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:59:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 977 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788222</link>
      <description>Contractual designation and conduct establishing custody of goods, sale at company prescribed prices, banking of proceeds and turnover based commission confirm the appellant&#039;s status as a consignment agent, which falls within clearing and forwarding agent services under Section 65(25) and Section 65(105)(j) of the Finance Act, 1994; accordingly service tax demand is sustained. The appellant&#039;s filing of &#039;Nil&#039; returns and non disclosure of commission receipts justify invocation of the extended period of limitation. Payment of service tax with interest before issuance of the show cause notice and partial payment of penalty warrant mitigation: no further Section 78 recovery beyond the amount paid and Section 77 penalty reduced.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788222</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>