<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 980 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788225</link>
    <description>Extended period of limitation cannot be invoked where revenue relies solely on discrepancies between returns and balance sheet entries without independent evidence of suppression or wilful misstatement; accordingly demands based on such invocation are time-barred. Classification of the appellant as a commission agent rendering business auxiliary services was unsupported by evidence of a principal agent or service recipient relationship and exceeded the scope of the show cause notices, so that taxability finding fails. Consequential denial of cenvat credit and imposition of interest and penalties collapse with the primary demands. The appellate orders are set aside and the appeals allowed with consequential reliefs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:59:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891394" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 980 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788225</link>
      <description>Extended period of limitation cannot be invoked where revenue relies solely on discrepancies between returns and balance sheet entries without independent evidence of suppression or wilful misstatement; accordingly demands based on such invocation are time-barred. Classification of the appellant as a commission agent rendering business auxiliary services was unsupported by evidence of a principal agent or service recipient relationship and exceeded the scope of the show cause notices, so that taxability finding fails. Consequential denial of cenvat credit and imposition of interest and penalties collapse with the primary demands. The appellate orders are set aside and the appeals allowed with consequential reliefs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>