<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 990 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788235</link>
    <description>Section 65 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code addresses fraudulent or malicious initiation of the corporate insolvency resolution process for purposes other than genuine insolvency resolution. Relevant indicators include failure by the initiating creditor to pursue its claim, timing of admission against pending tax recovery, related-party connections, and conduct suggesting use of the moratorium to obstruct recovery. Where abuse is established, CIRP may be terminated and penal or compensatory costs imposed. The initiating party may be directed to bear the resolution professional&#039;s fees and CIRP expenses where corporate assets are unavailable, the committee of creditors is non-functioning, and the circumstances justify departure from ordinary cost allocation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:59:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891384" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 990 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788235</link>
      <description>Section 65 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code addresses fraudulent or malicious initiation of the corporate insolvency resolution process for purposes other than genuine insolvency resolution. Relevant indicators include failure by the initiating creditor to pursue its claim, timing of admission against pending tax recovery, related-party connections, and conduct suggesting use of the moratorium to obstruct recovery. Where abuse is established, CIRP may be terminated and penal or compensatory costs imposed. The initiating party may be directed to bear the resolution professional&#039;s fees and CIRP expenses where corporate assets are unavailable, the committee of creditors is non-functioning, and the circumstances justify departure from ordinary cost allocation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788235</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>