https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788274 Once the original or authenticated documents were placed on the trial record, the challenge based on their earlier non-production became infructuous. Questions about the evidentiary value of foreign documents, including authenticity, admissibility, and mode of proof, were to be decided when evidence is led rather than at the threshold. The accused was recognised as entitled to inspect prosecution material under the applicable court rules and to raise objections on genuineness, admissibility, and proof at the proper trial stage. The complaint was therefore not rejected on that ground, while the right to contest the documents in evidence was preserved. en-us Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:59:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788274 Once the original or authenticated documents were placed on the trial record, the challenge based on their earlier non-production became infructuous. Questions about the evidentiary value of foreign documents, including authenticity, admissibility, and mode of proof, were to be decided when evidence is led rather than at the threshold. The accused was recognised as entitled to inspect prosecution material under the applicable court rules and to raise objections on genuineness, admissibility, and proof at the proper trial stage. The complaint was therefore not rejected on that ground, while the right to contest the documents in evidence was preserved. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788274