<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 1034 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788279</link>
    <description>Limitation for initiating proceedings against non-residents under the tax withholding framework is noted as the central issue, with the High Court&#039;s reasoning said to follow Bharti Airtel Ltd., which applied a reasonable time limit where Parliament had not prescribed a statutory bar. The special leave petition was reported to be delayed and the Supreme Court declined to condone the delay, so the petition was dismissed on that ground without entering the merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:59:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891340" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 1034 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788279</link>
      <description>Limitation for initiating proceedings against non-residents under the tax withholding framework is noted as the central issue, with the High Court&#039;s reasoning said to follow Bharti Airtel Ltd., which applied a reasonable time limit where Parliament had not prescribed a statutory bar. The special leave petition was reported to be delayed and the Supreme Court declined to condone the delay, so the petition was dismissed on that ground without entering the merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>