<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 142 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50655</link>
    <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of central excise duty and penalty was stayed pending appeal because the appellants showed a strong prima facie case and immediate deposit would cause undue hardship. The Tribunal considered the dispute on the place of removal, including the relevance of railway receipts and the supply arrangement, and found that interim relief was justified on the facts presented.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:44:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89134" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 142 - CEGAT, COURT NO. I, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50655</link>
      <description>Waiver of pre-deposit was granted and recovery of central excise duty and penalty was stayed pending appeal because the appellants showed a strong prima facie case and immediate deposit would cause undue hardship. The Tribunal considered the dispute on the place of removal, including the relevance of railway receipts and the supply arrangement, and found that interim relief was justified on the facts presented.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50655</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>