https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788291 A writ challenge to GST search and seizure was treated as premature once proceedings under Section 74 had already been initiated, because the petitioner was expected to participate in those statutory proceedings before assailing any eventual order. The Court applied limited review under Article 226 and held that the sufficiency of the material or reasons for authorising the search could not be examined as though in appeal. The request for immediate release of seized goods was also not granted, as the respondents indicated release could follow production of valid documents, but none were produced. en-us Thu, 12 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:59:45 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788291 A writ challenge to GST search and seizure was treated as premature once proceedings under Section 74 had already been initiated, because the petitioner was expected to participate in those statutory proceedings before assailing any eventual order. The Court applied limited review under Article 226 and held that the sufficiency of the material or reasons for authorising the search could not be examined as though in appeal. The request for immediate release of seized goods was also not granted, as the respondents indicated release could follow production of valid documents, but none were produced. Case-Laws GST Thu, 12 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788291