<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Documentary evidence reliability: unauthenticated marketing sheets and portal rates cannot sustain sales suppression additions, deletions ordered.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97848</link>
    <description>Seized marketing &#039;welcome letters&#039; and loose undated digital sheets were held insufficiently reliable to support additions for alleged suppression of sales absent signatures, buyer confirmations, bank-trace or other corroboration; extrapolation of undeclared sales by applying unauthenticated online portal asking rates was held speculative and inadmissible without seized evidence, buyer examination, comparable deeds or valuation; for unexplained cash credits the assessee discharged primary onus by producing identity, ledger entries, bank records and lender financials and repayments, and the AO failed to rebut with cogent material; approval by the range head for assessment proceedings was found to be non-mechanical. Operative effect: document-based and extrapolated additions and unexplained-loan additions were deleted, while approval validity was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:59:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:59:46 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891296" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Documentary evidence reliability: unauthenticated marketing sheets and portal rates cannot sustain sales suppression additions, deletions ordered.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97848</link>
      <description>Seized marketing &#039;welcome letters&#039; and loose undated digital sheets were held insufficiently reliable to support additions for alleged suppression of sales absent signatures, buyer confirmations, bank-trace or other corroboration; extrapolation of undeclared sales by applying unauthenticated online portal asking rates was held speculative and inadmissible without seized evidence, buyer examination, comparable deeds or valuation; for unexplained cash credits the assessee discharged primary onus by producing identity, ledger entries, bank records and lender financials and repayments, and the AO failed to rebut with cogent material; approval by the range head for assessment proceedings was found to be non-mechanical. Operative effect: document-based and extrapolated additions and unexplained-loan additions were deleted, while approval validity was upheld.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 08:59:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>