<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (9) TMI 137 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50650</link>
    <description>An allegation of clandestine manufacture and removal of yarn must be proved by reliable, corroborated evidence meeting the requisite standard of probability. The creel register was held insufficient on its own because its entries and abbreviations were ambiguous and not shown to exclusively record non-duty-paid yarn movements. Promptly retracted statements also lost evidentiary value and could not safely serve as corroboration. As the investigation remained incomplete on inputs, purchasers, and surrounding circumstances, the department failed to discharge the burden of proof. The demand and penalties could not therefore be sustained.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Aug 2010 11:36:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=89129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (9) TMI 137 - CEGAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50650</link>
      <description>An allegation of clandestine manufacture and removal of yarn must be proved by reliable, corroborated evidence meeting the requisite standard of probability. The creel register was held insufficient on its own because its entries and abbreviations were ambiguous and not shown to exclusively record non-duty-paid yarn movements. Promptly retracted statements also lost evidentiary value and could not safely serve as corroboration. As the investigation remained incomplete on inputs, purchasers, and surrounding circumstances, the department failed to discharge the burden of proof. The demand and penalties could not therefore be sustained.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=50650</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>