<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GST implication on forfeiture of advance received</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120820</link>
    <description>Forfeited advances for non-lifting of goods, where no separate agreement to tolerate the buyer&#039;s failure exists, operate as liquidated damages and not as consideration for a supply; administrative guidance and rulings treat such forfeiture as consequence of breach and therefore not subject to GST absent an express contractual arrangement creating a tolerance service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 15:20:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 01:22:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>GST implication on forfeiture of advance received</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120820</link>
      <description>Forfeited advances for non-lifting of goods, where no separate agreement to tolerate the buyer&#039;s failure exists, operate as liquidated damages and not as consideration for a supply; administrative guidance and rulings treat such forfeiture as consequence of breach and therefore not subject to GST absent an express contractual arrangement creating a tolerance service.</description>
      <category>Discussion-Forum</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 15:20:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/forum/issue?id=120820</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>