https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467422 Anticipatory bail in an alleged fake Input Tax Credit fraud case was declined because the investigation was still ongoing and the material suggested fake invoices, non-existent suppliers, and transactions requiring further verification. The Court considered that the genuineness of the suppliers and the movement of goods had not yet been established, and that custodial interrogation was necessary to trace the alleged fraudulent activity. On that basis, pre-arrest protection was found unwarranted and anticipatory bail was refused. en-us Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 18 Mar 2026 11:30:31 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467422 Anticipatory bail in an alleged fake Input Tax Credit fraud case was declined because the investigation was still ongoing and the material suggested fake invoices, non-existent suppliers, and transactions requiring further verification. The Court considered that the genuineness of the suppliers and the movement of goods had not yet been established, and that custodial interrogation was necessary to trace the alleged fraudulent activity. On that basis, pre-arrest protection was found unwarranted and anticipatory bail was refused. Case-Laws GST Thu, 21 Apr 2022 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467422