<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1589 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467419</link>
    <description>Where a departmental revenue audit objection was accepted, a prior appellate dismissal based on a low tax appeal policy was treated as a mistake apparent on record and recalled, directing fresh hearing on merits. The governing CBDT circulars set monetary limits for Revenue appeals but carve out an exception where an accepted revenue audit objection yields an adverse appellate outcome; omission to consider that exception in the appellate order justified recall and remand for determination by the appropriate Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 11:18:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1589 - ITAT ALLAHABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467419</link>
      <description>Where a departmental revenue audit objection was accepted, a prior appellate dismissal based on a low tax appeal policy was treated as a mistake apparent on record and recalled, directing fresh hearing on merits. The governing CBDT circulars set monetary limits for Revenue appeals but carve out an exception where an accepted revenue audit objection yields an adverse appellate outcome; omission to consider that exception in the appellate order justified recall and remand for determination by the appropriate Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>