<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 922 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788167</link>
    <description>Civil penalties for contravention of statutory obligations under FEMA do not require proof of mens rea. A company&#039;s chief financial officer was found to have actively participated in the relevant transactions and admitted that involvement in statements recorded under FEMA. As the company&#039;s contraventions were established, liability for penalty was sustained under the provision governing penalties for company-related contraventions. However, proportionality warranted a reduction in the penalty, and the pre-deposit was directed to be adjusted against the reduced liability. The appeal was partly allowed to that extent.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 08:20:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891157" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 922 - APPELLATE TRIBUNAL UNDER SAFEMA, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788167</link>
      <description>Civil penalties for contravention of statutory obligations under FEMA do not require proof of mens rea. A company&#039;s chief financial officer was found to have actively participated in the relevant transactions and admitted that involvement in statements recorded under FEMA. As the company&#039;s contraventions were established, liability for penalty was sustained under the provision governing penalties for company-related contraventions. However, proportionality warranted a reduction in the penalty, and the pre-deposit was directed to be adjusted against the reduced liability. The appeal was partly allowed to that extent.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788167</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>