https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788169 Orders passed after a matter had been reserved for judgment, and on the basis of a mention by counsel for non-parties without notice to the affected appellants, were treated as procedurally unsustainable. The Tribunal's analysis emphasised that once hearings had concluded, any new material brought to its notice had to be shared with the parties and addressed through a fair opportunity to respond. Because the appellants were not heard before the impugned orders were made, the requirements of natural justice and audi alteram partem were not satisfied. The orders were therefore liable to be quashed and the matters remitted for fresh consideration after hearing all parties. en-us Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Apr 2026 18:22:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788169 Orders passed after a matter had been reserved for judgment, and on the basis of a mention by counsel for non-parties without notice to the affected appellants, were treated as procedurally unsustainable. The Tribunal's analysis emphasised that once hearings had concluded, any new material brought to its notice had to be shared with the parties and addressed through a fair opportunity to respond. Because the appellants were not heard before the impugned orders were made, the requirements of natural justice and audi alteram partem were not satisfied. The orders were therefore liable to be quashed and the matters remitted for fresh consideration after hearing all parties. Case-Laws IBC Thu, 26 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788169