<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 932 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788177</link>
    <description>Voluntary admission that an IEC was lent for monetary consideration satisfies elements of confiscation liability and false-declaration offences: allowing third parties to use an IEC renders imported goods liable to confiscation under the Customs statutory scheme and amounts to knowingly enabling false or incorrect trade documentation. The analysis applies Section 112(a) and Section 114AA principles alongside FT(DR)A/Rules and Foreign Trade Policy limits on IEC use, treating un-retracted admissions as proof of knowledge and intent. Operative effect: penalties for permitting use of an IEC were sustained and the monetary penalty affirmed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 08:20:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891147" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 932 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788177</link>
      <description>Voluntary admission that an IEC was lent for monetary consideration satisfies elements of confiscation liability and false-declaration offences: allowing third parties to use an IEC renders imported goods liable to confiscation under the Customs statutory scheme and amounts to knowingly enabling false or incorrect trade documentation. The analysis applies Section 112(a) and Section 114AA principles alongside FT(DR)A/Rules and Foreign Trade Policy limits on IEC use, treating un-retracted admissions as proof of knowledge and intent. Operative effect: penalties for permitting use of an IEC were sustained and the monetary penalty affirmed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788177</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>