<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 953 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788198</link>
    <description>Reassessment under section 148/147 is addressed on the basis that the test for reopening depends on the real income chargeable to tax, not the gross value of transactions; where the reassessed taxable income, after accounting for documented deductions, remains below the monetary threshold specified in the statute, jurisdiction to reopen is absent and the reassessment cannot stand. The decision quashes the reopening and the consequent assessment on that jurisdictional ground, without adjudicating subsidiary challenges.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 08:20:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 953 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788198</link>
      <description>Reassessment under section 148/147 is addressed on the basis that the test for reopening depends on the real income chargeable to tax, not the gross value of transactions; where the reassessed taxable income, after accounting for documented deductions, remains below the monetary threshold specified in the statute, jurisdiction to reopen is absent and the reassessment cannot stand. The decision quashes the reopening and the consequent assessment on that jurisdictional ground, without adjudicating subsidiary challenges.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788198</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>