<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Presumption of Service: deemed Form B notice and concealment of developments led to dismissal and costs imposed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97806</link>
    <description>Presumption of service of a Form B demand notice was applied: notices sent to addresses in the guarantee deed and bank records gave rise to a deeming presumption of communication, and the admission under Section 95 was held not vitiated. A challenge alleging non-service was rejected. Separately, a duty to disclose material developments was enforced: concealment of the closure of the personal insolvency resolution process, delay in rectifying registry defects, and failure to submit a revised plan evidenced mala fides, justified costs, and rendered the appeal ineffective; the appeal was dismissed with costs payable to a relief fund.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 08:21:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 08:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891081" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Presumption of Service: deemed Form B notice and concealment of developments led to dismissal and costs imposed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97806</link>
      <description>Presumption of service of a Form B demand notice was applied: notices sent to addresses in the guarantee deed and bank records gave rise to a deeming presumption of communication, and the admission under Section 95 was held not vitiated. A challenge alleging non-service was rejected. Separately, a duty to disclose material developments was enforced: concealment of the closure of the personal insolvency resolution process, delay in rectifying registry defects, and failure to submit a revised plan evidenced mala fides, justified costs, and rendered the appeal ineffective; the appeal was dismissed with costs payable to a relief fund.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2026 08:21:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=97806</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>