<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (11) TMI 1601 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467399</link>
    <description>Interference with interim orders passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was declined while the Section 17 application remained pending before the Arbitral Tribunal. The Court left the parties to advance their submissions before the Tribunal and disposed of the special leave petitions, indicating that the interim arrangement should be addressed in the ongoing arbitral process rather than disturbed at that stage.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 22:01:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891070" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (11) TMI 1601 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467399</link>
      <description>Interference with interim orders passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was declined while the Section 17 application remained pending before the Arbitral Tribunal. The Court left the parties to advance their submissions before the Tribunal and disposed of the special leave petitions, indicating that the interim arrangement should be addressed in the ongoing arbitral process rather than disturbed at that stage.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Nov 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467399</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>