<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2021 (9) TMI 1588 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467397</link>
    <description>Petition for refund was treated as satisfied where the petitioner has received the claimed refund; the court recorded receipt and disposed the writ petition as satisfied without adjudicating the substantive merits of the refund claim. The operative effect is termination of the pending writ proceeding by satisfaction of the claimed relief, with no determination on entitlement or merits recorded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:59:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=891037" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2021 (9) TMI 1588 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467397</link>
      <description>Petition for refund was treated as satisfied where the petitioner has received the claimed refund; the court recorded receipt and disposed the writ petition as satisfied without adjudicating the substantive merits of the refund claim. The operative effect is termination of the pending writ proceeding by satisfaction of the claimed relief, with no determination on entitlement or merits recorded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=467397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>