<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 846 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788091</link>
    <description>Amounts compulsorily levied by a statutory authority for regulated auction activity were held not to be consideration for taxable service, so the auction fee was outside service tax. Storage of unmanufactured tobacco was treated as storage of agricultural produce excluded from the storage and warehousing category, so no tax applied. Demurrage for delayed lifting was regarded as a penal charge rather than consideration for any service, so it was not taxable. Because the demands failed on merits and the dispute involved statutory interpretation without wilful suppression, the extended period of limitation was also held inapplicable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 846 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788091</link>
      <description>Amounts compulsorily levied by a statutory authority for regulated auction activity were held not to be consideration for taxable service, so the auction fee was outside service tax. Storage of unmanufactured tobacco was treated as storage of agricultural produce excluded from the storage and warehousing category, so no tax applied. Demurrage for delayed lifting was regarded as a penal charge rather than consideration for any service, so it was not taxable. Because the demands failed on merits and the dispute involved statutory interpretation without wilful suppression, the extended period of limitation was also held inapplicable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788091</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>