<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (3) TMI 854 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788099</link>
    <description>A financial creditor claiming interest on an unsecured loan in insolvency proceedings must substantiate that entitlement with contractual or documentary evidence; balance-sheet entries alone do not establish a right to interest. A board resolution concerning another promoter&#039;s separate claim could not support the appellants&#039; request, because claim collation is an administrative exercise based on material placed before the resolution professional. On that basis, the claim was admitted only to the principal amount and the challenge to rejection of the interest component was not interfered with.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 08:23:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=890979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (3) TMI 854 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788099</link>
      <description>A financial creditor claiming interest on an unsecured loan in insolvency proceedings must substantiate that entitlement with contractual or documentary evidence; balance-sheet entries alone do not establish a right to interest. A board resolution concerning another promoter&#039;s separate claim could not support the appellants&#039; request, because claim collation is an administrative exercise based on material placed before the resolution professional. On that basis, the claim was admitted only to the principal amount and the challenge to rejection of the interest component was not interfered with.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=788099</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>